Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
Guided by education inequality theories and based on a nationally-representative survey, this paper examines the relationship between rural-urban migration and compulsory education equality. Focusing on educational opportunities and developmental outcomes through three sets of comparisons, our results showed that both brought-along and left-behind children lag behind their respective urban/rural reference group. Even though brought-along children have similar school structural quality as their urban counterparts do, they are disadvantageous in more subtle school qualities and supplemental education, which may translate into worse cognitive/academic outcomes, although not mental health outcomes. Left-behind children face fewer learning opportunities and fare worse in all domains of developmental outcomes than rural children of non-migrants. Among children of migrants, brought-along children fare better than left-behind children. These findings suggest that serious policy and program intervention efforts are needed to achieve greater compulsory education equality.