Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
This paper develops and tests theory to explain the puzzling tendency for high-status actors to consume cultural products that are associated with low-status groups. The theory builds on Hahl and Zuckerman’s (2014) theory of “high-status denigration,” which holds that typical features of the status attainment process cause suspicion to be cast on the authenticity and considerateness of high-status actors. The logic of this theory is here extended in two ways. First, we focus on the specific case of “outsider art” to argue that the appeal of art produced by low-status actors lies not in its low status but in the moral authenticity it derives from the artist’s apparent lack of concern with extrinsic rewards. Second, we argue that public appreciation for such morally authentic art helps to override the tendency towards “high-status denigration.” Results from a series of experiments, which test individuals’ impressions of how other individuals rate the status and authenticity of particular works of art and those who consume such art, as well as the differences in preference for such art by social position provide validation for the theory. Implications are drawn regarding the sources of demand for cultural products, and the dynamics of such demand.