Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
Researchers have examined Western cases where lawyers within legal complexes have pursued a broadening of their own society’s civil and political rights. The current paper challenges the argument that Taiwan’s legal complex substantially contributed to democratization there. I argue that the legal complex made little contribution to Taiwan’s democratization. Indeed, three types of legal professionals (lawyers, judges, and prosecutors) sought to render the legal complex independent from the state by exploiting a political space opened by other social and political activists. After the goals of independence reform were achieved, the legal complex was not accountable to Taiwan’s democratic politics, nor did the complex contribute significantly to democratic consolidation in Taiwan. This paper shows that the role of Taiwan’s legal complex in the process of democratization has been far more complicated and far less promising than is typically thought.