Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
About Annual Meeting
Why do some groups mobilize while others do not? How do local struggles “link up” to form movements of larger scale? These are core questions within social movement studies. However, the tendency of social movement scholars to “select on the dependent variable” has limited our understanding of mobilization, and “scale shift” (Tarrow and McAdam 2005). Few studies consider both positive and negative cases of mobilization. My research addresses this gap by comparing anti-fracking mobilization in New York and Pennsylvania at the county-level. Using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), and unique data on the founding of anti-fracking organizations, I offer insight into the conditions that facilitate mobilization, and the development of large-scale social movements. This research also helps to explain differences in the strength and influence of the anti-fracking movement in New York and Pennsylvania.