Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App (Available July)
About Annual Meeting
The link between racial identity and genetics, ancestry, and phenotype has been historically contentious. Recent media debates brought these issues to the fore when Rachel Dolezal, an activist born to white parents, publicly identified herself as ‘black’ and ‘transracial.’ Despite sound scientific evidence establishing no genetic basis for the concept of race, mainstream journalism largely responded to the Dolezal controversy with the proposition that racial identity is the byproduct of genetic traits. In this article, I approach the rhetoric and ideologies constituting this Dolezal media storm as a case study on the relationship between racial identities and racial background. Through examination of United States-based newspaper articles (N=263) published in the aftermath of the Dolezal controversy, I assess contemporary media discourse surrounding racial essentialism, identity, and cultural appropriation. I uncover that mainstream media narratives from all sides of the political spectrum, even progressive and scholarly sources, construct and reinforce a narrative of racial essentialism, often unintentionally and cloaked within a language of racial authenticity and cultural appropriation. These results question the impact that the social constructionist perspective on race has had on mainstream media understandings of the relationship between race and biology.