Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App (Available July)
About Annual Meeting
Do individuals gain from mobilizing both expert knowledge and lay knowledge? If so, what are the foundations? This paper addresses these questions by investigating health care outcomes from the users of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) who mobilize different knowledge bases regarding CAM treatments. By using data from the 2012 US National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), the paper finds that CAM users have better outcomes when they use CAM treatments that experts (i.e. health care professionals) or lay people (i.e. family/friends/co-workers) recommend, compared to those that nobody recommends. CAM users have even better care outcomes from treatments that both professionals and family/friends/co-workers recommend, compared to those that only professionals or only family/friends/co-workers recommend. The paper conceptualizes this complementarity between expert knowledge and lay knowledge as emerging from the thick knowledge that experts and lay people produce together in mutual embeddedness.