Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App (Available July)
About Annual Meeting
Much attention has been paid to the challenges of designing effective diversity initiatives (Kalev, Dobbin, & Kelly, 2006). Yet one challenge that remains relatively unexplored is the problem of change agent departure: what happens to a change initiative when the primary change agent leaves the organization? Even change initiatives with substantial money, resources, and publicity often suffer dissolution after the departure of a primary change agent (e.g. Peterson, 2013). What factors help an initiative survive change agent turnover? How can a diversity change initiative become embedded in the larger organization, rather than remaining tied to specific individuals? To explore these questions, I use unique case study data from two sites—an academic medical center and a technology company. Both organizations implemented gender-related change initiatives, and both organizations lost their primary change agent midway through implementation; however, in one case, the initiative continued to thrive, while in the other case, the initiative was subsequently discontinued. Analyzing a combination of interviews (68 interviews conducted with 55 people), observation (76 meetings), and primary source data (29 recorded conversations), this paper builds a new theoretical model to identify the factors that help embed a change initiative into the larger organization, thereby reducing the risk of dissolution following the departure of a primary change agent.