Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App (Available July)
About Annual Meeting
This paper evaluates the long history of transnational labor activists’ attempts to institutionalize international labor norms and law through bilateral and multilateral United States free trade agreements, emphasizing that present scholarship ignores the importance of the symbolic dimensions of law in evaluating this history. The transnational labor movement has hoped that creating international institutions that protect labor rights will create systems that globalize labor in parallel to capital’s globalizing legal institutions, such as the World Trade Organization. Labor’s ability to globalize depends on whether international labor law is understood merely as instrumental law¬, dependent on central state power, politics, and enforceability, or whether international law also gains force from symbolic dimensions of norm-creation that help construct identities, values, and global norms. This paper builds on concepts of transnational advocacy networks to describe the development and actualization of transnational norms through the mediating domestic social structures of national states. This approach highlights how present scholarship fails to fully account for activist definitions of success and considers how the symbolic dimensions of law explains the processes through which labor globalizes under conditions of severe constraint.