Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App (Available July)
About Annual Meeting
In recent years, the geography of poverty has significantly shifted from an urban to a suburban setting, and the populations living in the poorer suburbs are increasingly racially diverse, including many who are first generation immigrants. However, within suburban communities, non-profit organizations (NPOs) combatting poverty are working from an infrastructure that is less robust than that of large cities. The combination of these trends begs the question: how does funding and staff capacity differ across urban and suburban NPOs? How do differences in social service infrastructure influence the strategies NPOs use to accomplish their mission? I examine this question through interviews with ten service providers at eight NPOs providing legal aid in the socio-economically and racially diverse city of Oakland and in Contra Costa County – a county where poverty rates have increased, particularly in the suburbs, and where the immigrant population has significantly grown. I find that while a smaller scale of social service infrastructure coincides with lower resources in the suburbs, the under-resourced atmosphere leads to more cohesiveness among a broader set of organizations and institutions. Suburban NPOs can use this cohesiveness to build capacity in their region along with other institutions and actors.