Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App (Available July)
About Annual Meeting
Studies that examine elite formation through education show that elite students use cultural capital to establish hierarchies in school. However, the value of cultural capital varies across “fields,” or educational systems, and many systems reward academics over cultural capital. Yet, the role of academics in adolescent elite status formation has not been given sufficient attention. This study draws on data from participant observation and interviews with students, parents, and teachers in six top-performing Chinese high schools. I examine the case of China because of the country’s standardized examination system, which prioritizes academics over other student characteristics. I find that in such a system, elite students primarily use academics to establish status hierarchies, while cultural capital is of secondary importance. Academic performances shape student interactions, and elite students justify the hierarchies by arguing that status reflects innate ability. Given that they will likely become the future socioeconomic elites, top-performing elite students’ justification of status distinction carries implications for social inequality. To the extent that China is a rising global power, the findings carry implications for social stratification beyond the Chinese context.