Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App (Available July)
About Annual Meeting
Public endorsement of biological causes of mental illness has become more prevalent in recent decades. While some view this biological turn as a promising development, mental illness stigma has not abated. Because most Americans believe multiple factors cause mental illness, we contend that any belief in a biological cause should be understood as a part of the larger mosaic of causal beliefs. However, understanding the highly complex pathways by which several beliefs may lead to stigma requires an alternative to traditional regression analysis. Toward this end, we use qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) on the 2006 General Social Survey to reveal the role of particular belief configurations in the stigmatization of depression, schizophrenia, and alcoholism (N=971). These configurations provide a potential explanation for the mixed reception of the biological turn by the American public. More generally, belief configurations are a new and important tool for conceptualizing and analyzing social stigma.