Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Presentation Tips
Request a Visa Letter
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App (Available July)
About Annual Meeting
Despite the fact that parents’ time with children has increased in recent years, many parents think they are not spending enough time with their offspring. We examine employed mothers’ and fathers’ views that they have “too little time” with children using the 2011 nationally representative Canadian Work, Stress, and Health study (N=1,347). Two competing perspectives -- the public face versus the pernicious stressor -- are examined. The public face hypothesis suggests that employed parents may present themselves as “good” mothers or fathers through an expressed desire for more time with children, but these expressions should not matter for health outcomes. Alternatively, the pernicious stressor hypothesis posits that demands of intensive mothering or involved fathering create time tensions that act as important strains, affecting health. About half of mothers and fathers feel time shortfalls with their children, and this is linked to work hours, schedule control and location of work, and to family context. Supporting the pernicious stressor perspective, we find strong relationships between “too little” time with children and parents’ distress, anger, and sleep problems, even when adjusting for key work and family factors.