Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Main Menu (Submission Site)
Sign Out
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
X (Twitter)
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
About Annual Meeting
Search Tips
About Annual Meeting
This article advances the study of immigrant transnational mobilization by comparing Libyan, Syrian, and Yemeni activism across the US and Britain on behalf of the Arab Spring. Though immigrants in the West are assumed to be well-positioned to fuel insurgencies and humanitarian causes from abroad, the literature neglects to investigate why only some of their movements become auxiliaries for rebellion and relief in their countries-of-origin. Using 240 in-depth interviews representing 62 movements, the analysis demonstrates that activists’ roles vary according to four factors: their network ties to conflict zones; incorporation into third-party interventions; access to liberated territory; and movement professionalization. The findings contribute to theories of how networks, political opportunities, and organizational adaptations shape transnational movement dynamics and illustrate the importance of using comparative, cross-national perspectives.