Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Main Menu (Submission Site)
Sign Out
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
Search Tips
About Annual Meeting
Search Tips
About Annual Meeting
Why do unpopular norms persist? Existing approaches see this issue as an information problem, where individuals misconstrue a norm as popular and conform so as to fake their endorsement. But even when actors know of a norm’s unpopularity, conformity often seems to continue. My theory and evidence identify when and why individuals conform to such a visibly unpopular norm by focusing on the need to signal commitment in relationships. While navigating uncertainties in relationships, actors often need to discern whether their relationship partners are committed to collective interests over their private interests. In this context, a conformist to a visibly unpopular norm appears willing even to violate her personal interest to meet a behavioral standard set out by the community (i.e., norm). Therefore, conformity to a visibly unpopular norm signals greater commitment to collective interests than does nonconformity. I leverage the case of a visibly unpopular norm around drinking in after-hour gatherings in South Korea and show that such costly conformity credibly signals commitment. A macro implication is that an unpopular norm might persist not despite its unpopularity, but precisely because of its (visible) unpopularity.