Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Main Menu (Submission Site)
Sign Out
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
X (Twitter)
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
About Annual Meeting
Search Tips
About Annual Meeting
In recent decades there has been a pronounced shift in the strategy of land reform movements in the global South from armed revolutionary movements to land rights movements. Rather than seeking to topple the state and its laws through violence, land rights movements incorporate a rights discourse and mobilize mass-based nonviolent resistance to leverage constitutional laws in an attempt to compel the state to implement land reform. Through paired-comparison I examine two contemporary examples—Ekta Parishad in India and the Landless Rural Workers Movement (MST) in Brazil. I describe legal justifications for land reform and traditional forces that have inhibited land reform in India and Brazil. I then identify contextual factors that explain why a broadly comparable land rights strategy was developed by Ekta Parishad and the MST and explain key dynamics of the struggles. The analysis suggests that under certain structural conditions the state and its laws—when combined with sustained mass mobilization—can promote counter-hegemonic reforms and a more just distribution of land.