Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Main Menu (Submission Site)
Sign Out
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
Search Tips
About Annual Meeting
Search Tips
About Annual Meeting
Do ‘final say’ survey questions measure power within families? Researchers rely on these items as proxy indicators of gender inequality within households, although there are reasons to doubt decision making is equated with power. I review relative resources and exchange theory predictions about decision making and two potential moderators: the gender system and methods of allocating income. Using original data (n = 3,975) from a vignette-survey experiment to disentangle the mechanisms leading to decision making authority, I find higher relative earners within families are not regarded as entitled to the final word in decisions. Whether respondents considered earnings individually or community owned did not explain the lack of association between financial resources and decision making clout. Findings show a significant association between the decider’s gender and perceptions of fairness: specifically, when women were presented as the decider over monetary family choices, unilateral decision making was viewed more favorably. Results from the qualitative analysis of the reasoning behind these evaluations were consistent with beliefs in egalitarian essentialism, that women and men are equal but characteristically different. Findings suggest ‘final say’ measures should be interpreted cautiously as markers of power and offers insights into why gender equality within families remains stalled.