Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Browse By Topic
Personal Schedule
Main Menu (Submission Site)
Sign Out
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Requesting AV
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
X (Twitter)
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
About Annual Meeting
Search Tips
About Annual Meeting
In this paper, I use archival research on the planning process of Brooklyn Bridge Park (BBP) to illustrate how design becomes political. I examine the way social structure was injected into debates concerning the material form of the space. In advocating for specific designs and defending or criticizing the plan to place housing in the park, community members constructed different “imagined constituencies”: groups of prospective users who would benefit from the space. As a result of these competing visions, the park is a collage of objects and environments, each reflecting a different specific idea about recreation and leisure – an ensemble of closed programs that may prove inflexible as Brooklyn evolves socially and economically, particularly in light of a semi-private governance structure that threatens to turn the entire park into merely a “front lawn” for luxury condominiums.