Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
About Annual Meeting
Legal professionals assisting victims seeking civil protection orders mare exposed to traumatic stressors and may themselves be traumatized. I examine how the emotional labor of attorneys, paralegals, and other legal workers may function as a mechanism of trauma transference by actively listening, clarifying, and recording incidents of abuse. Feeling rules that guide intake workers’ behavior, such as the belief that one can never cry in front of a client, reflect a type of workplace emotion regulation. I argue that whether workers maintain affective neutrality or a high level of empathetic engagement leads to differential outcomes for the level of assistance victims receive and workers’ well-being. By investigating the distribution of emotional labor in legal institutions I build upon existing scholarship on victimization, emotional labor, and stress literature. Through in-depth interviews, I identify four major themes 1) clients are in ‘active trauma’, 2) workers employ a variety of therapeutic strategies to assist victims in recalling relevant details and dates, 3) feeling rules and emotional labor established for intake workers takes an emotional and sometimes physical toll, 4) Lower status intake workers may bear a larger share of emotional labor so that expectations of empathetic engagements and its consequences are not equally distributed. Understanding feeling rules for legal actors and their potential consequences provides new avenues of study to examine the sources and consequences of power inequalities in the legal system.