Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
X (Twitter)
Search Tips
About Annual Meeting
Examinations of the “particularistic mobility thesis” have focused on a narrow range of occupational destinations and not considered hierarchical aspects—such as the presence of a racialized “glass ceiling”—in mobility dynamics. We assess these shortcomings in examining African American/White men’s differences in the incidence and determinants of mobility into four white-collar and blue-collar privileged occupational destinations. Findings from a 2009-2014 Panel Study of Income Dynamics sample support broadening the scope of theory. Specifically, across all destinations African Americans, relative to, Whites, have low rates of mobility, disproportionately rely on a mobility route that is formal and structured by a traditional range of stratification-based causal factors, and, finally, a racialized glass ceiling in mobility prospects emerges across destinations based on increases in income as well as supervisory authority. Additional analyses indicate that particularistic-based racial inequities are pronounced in the private sector though a racialized glass ceiling is found in both private and public sectors.
.