Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Updating Your Submission
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
Search Tips
About Annual Meeting
Most research on off-time role transitions (e.g., being an undergraduate older than 25) indicates a negative relationship with mental health; few studies have examined their potential for benefitting mental health. The current study does so by explicitly linking off-time status, “felt age” (how old we feel compared to our chronological age), and mental health to examine felt age as a possible mechanism through which off-time transitions may benefit mental health. Using a paired subsample of 638 adults between ages 25-74 from the MIDUS I (National Survey of Midlife Development in the United States) dataset, I compare adults not currently attending college at an off-time age (“on-timers”) and current off-time adult college attendees (“off-timers”). Regression results show that off-timers feel younger than their chronological ages compared to on-timers, and have higher levels of positive affect than on-timers. These stronger positive affect levels are fully mediated by off-timers feeling younger than their chronological ages. Off-time status had no significant effect on negative affect levels. Contrary to predictions, neither social class of origin, nor its interaction with off-time status, was significant for positive or negative affect. Findings indicate the need to more thoroughly examine aspects of off-time transitions and their effects, and suggest that mental health may be improved by older adults’ engagement in activities that are typically only expected for younger people.