Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Program Updates
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
Past research has examined straight allyship to the queer community from allies’ perspectives, but little is known about how queer people evaluate straight allies. The present study focuses on queer people’s expectations for allies and demonstrates the variation of expectations within the queer community. Drawing on in-depth interviews with 18 LGBTQ+ students from a large, public university in the southeastern U.S., we show that respondents formulate their expectations by leaning on their understanding of their own queerness in relation to other privileged and marginalized identities they possess. We find two opposing camps of thought: one that allies should be attuned to the individual needs of queer people in their personal lives, and the other that they should be actively dedicated to the needs of the broader queer community. These two camps are staunchly divided along dimensions race and (trans)gender identity; in the sample, white cisgender gay men expect apolitical allies while trans and gender nonconforming people of color expect allies to be extremely political involved. Some respondents expressed sentiments of both camps, showcasing how expectations range with diverse identity constellations. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of these results for queer rights movements.