Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Program Updates
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
Recent theories of the intersections between feminist activism and biomedicine have cast these as entanglements or otherwise (e.g. fields) in order to nuance analyses of cooptation. We consider two cases in order to more fully theorize the role of structural power in these entanglements. Specifically, we compare two historical cases: feminist reform of teaching and learning the pelvic exam in medical schools; and the feminist counseling in the anti-violence movement. In both of these cases, feminist activists engaged with, resisted, (re)appropriated, and were appropriated by biomedicine. We argue that by bringing insights from assemblage theory into interfield dynamics, we are better able to explain mechanisms of stability and change. We claim that while the objective stakes of the field remain largely unchanged, as in the case of biomedicine, tools and practices enter the field via assemblages and become part of the struggle of the larger field.