Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Program Updates
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
Organizations selling stigmatized products persist despite opposition from hostile audiences. Scholars have explained the viability of these organizations by detailing strategies organizations pursue to decrease public scrutiny and opposition. These explanations foreground how organizations attempt to conceal their stigma from hostile outsiders but rarely describe how these stigma management strategies affect selling products to customers. Yet stigmatized markets persist because consumers purchase stigmatized products, inviting further study into how stigma management strategies affect organizational performance. In this paper, I show how hiding stigma can hurt organizational performance by delegitimating products in the eyes of customers. Using deep learning to analyze product descriptions advertised by retailers in Washington State’s recreational cannabis market, I find that that hid their products’ stigmatized features performed worse across all contexts than organizations that did not. However, organizations that highlighted their products’ stigmatized features performed better than those that did not but only in areas where stigma was strongest. Together, these findings suggest that stigma could be an asset, not a liability, and that legitimacy-seeking behavior may undermine organizational performance.