Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Program Updates
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
Recent scholarship highlights the importance social movements for political processes, but it rarely examines how movements and counter-movements shape discursive opportunities and how these opportunities affect political contexts. We examine two important processes through which movements and counter-movements affect discursive opportunities and political opportunity structures. First, movements can change the political discourse in sympathetic media outlets; second, movements can affect sympathetic political parties’ perception of movements’ grievances. We employ text analyses of mass media and political party communications before and during the anti-corruption movement or the Candlelight Revolution in South Korea from late 2016 and early 2017. Our data comes from five newspapers, three political parties, and a social movement organization. Preliminary results suggests that the mass media revelation that the government was corrupted by a “shadowperson” triggered mass protests, which were socially amplified in the liberal media outlets and attenuated in conservative media. The media coverage of the protests appears to have created not only a favorable discursive opportunity but also a political opportunity, by aligning the liberal and the progressive parties with the movement.