Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Program Updates
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
An enduring question remains in institutional theory: how do people change institutions that are simultaneously guiding their actions? Two dominant sociological perspectives, institution work and inhabited institutionalism, attempt to answer this question arguing that people operate in a recursive cycle of institutional change. However, neither perspective has detailed a mechanism that bridges both sides of the cycle remaining focused on either micro- or macro-determinants of action. This paper remedies this oversight through a study of how the commercial cannabis industry has both shaped and been shaped by key laws determining the trajectory of the field across three institutional eras. I find that temporary or “provisional institutions” operate to provide guidance at both the individual and field-level, offering a way to scale between these analytical levels and providing an opportunity to integrate institution work and inhabited institutionalism.