Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Program Updates
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
Sociology has made significant progress in the specification of what culture is and how it impacts individual thought and action. On the wave of the growing interest in the cognitive underpinnings of cultural processes, sociologists have increasingly used the concept of schema as a mechanism for explaining how culture shapes individual thought and action by endowing individuals with mental representations. However, the conceptual vagaries that have led scholars to critique the notion of culture have now befallen that of schemas. There is little to no agreement about what schemas are, or clarity about how they operate. We review the ways in which schemas have been used in five top sociology journals between 1990 and 2016, and find that schemas are used to represent two distinct phenomena -- structures of substantive content and/or mental processes -- which are often conflated and confused. The use of schemas in the literature is also shaped by assumptions about their ontological nature and qualities, which depart from established knowledge about schemas. The current understanding and use of schemas is problematic not simply due to a lack of precision, but rather because cognitive processes become a black box at best, or they are confused with social processes at worst. This is an analytic problem with significant implications for sociology more generally.