Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Program Updates
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
A controversial concern in climate change study is the climate politics debate. Extreme weather events related to climate change either damage political stability and cause human conflict, or alternatively cause civil society to organize relief actions to save human lives. This study found that extreme weather events shift the power balance in favor of civil society, and thus increase the likelihood of democratization from authoritarian rule and reduce the likelihood of political violence. When climate disasters damage a country with a weak civil society, or an authoritarian regime suppresses the postdisaster mobilization of civil associations, it fuels political violence. Hypotheses are tested linking climate change, strength of civil society, and the probabilities of democratization and of political violence. Through integration of climate data and social indicators from 128 countries during 1980–2013, we reveal that climate disasters mobilize civil society to increase the likelihood of democratic transition and reduce the likelihood of armed conflict.