Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Program Updates
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
This paper engages with the question of coordinating action during transitional and politically volatile times, in high-stakes situations. I take grassroots activism in Istanbul, Turkey between 2017 and 2018 as a case in point, where, under a state of emergency, a constitutional referendum and presidential/general elections took place to institute a dictatorial regime. More specifically, I look at a local assembly that was established to campaign for the “no” vote against regime change in the referendum, and how it disintegrated at a time when coordinated action was perceived as the only viable strategy by the participants. Although social movement theory offers some explanations like political opportunities (McAdam, 1999), threats (Goldstone & Tilly, 2001), or strategic dilemmas (Jasper, 2006), it has largely overlooked future imaginings as a necessary temporal dimension that determines movement orientation and trajectories. Based on a total of 19 months of participant-observation supported by 47 in-depth, semi-structured interviews, I find that the disintegration of the assembly is best explained by the activists' competing interpretations and anticipations about the future. Using ethnographic field notes, I show how differences in temporal frameworks eroded the basis on which activists usually coordinated their next steps, leading to an unresolvable mismatch in expectations and hence, in action. I conclude by arguing that temporality in general and future imaginings in particular have not been systematically mobilized as a necessary explanatory dimension of activism. As such, this study contributes both to the study of social movements and the emerging “sociology of the future” (Mische, 2009).