Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Program Updates
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
The systemic risk regulation regime created under the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 is one of the primary targets of the Trump administration's agenda to dismantle the administrative state. This paper argues that this new regime is particularly vulnerable to such an attack because it rests on a hybrid form of governmental expertise the paper calls "resilience governmentality." Allowing policymakers to reach all the way into financial mammoths like Citibank and make executive decisions on their daily operations, resilience governmentality deploys a puzzling form of intervention that is too intrusive to be neoliberal, and yet too cautious and restricted to be “interventionist.” Tracing the genealogy of this intervention form, the paper shows that resilience governmentality was invented by a group of system analysts at the New Deal resource planning agencies to explain the Great Depression. These experts assembled a network of expertise to detect the systemically important points of vulnerability in the structure of the economy. Combining systemic analysis techniques (input-output interindustry tables) with non-monetary intervention instruments (stockpiles) under a problematization of the economy as a complex of vital and yet vulnerable economic systems, they sought to enhance the resilience of these systems by reducing the vulnerability of their systemically important points (the price of key commodity flows). Tracing the development of resilience governmentality at the Cold War defense mobilization preparedness agencies following the demise of the New Deal, the paper shows that this expertise network was remapped onto a financial ontology on the onset of the Latin American debt crisis to manage systemic risks in the financial system.