Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Program Updates
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
Social research on the separation of domestic and market life has focused primarily on household structure, its internal division of labor, and patriarchal ideology, leaving underexplored the role of municipal regulation in shaping household economic life. Leveraging diverse archival data, this paper explains the overlooked invention of land-use zoning in 1904, first separating residential and market life with legal force, before spreading to other cities. The largest outpost of western expansion, Los Angeles’ fateful regulatory innovation was a piecemeal solution to thirty years of racial panic and distributional tensions set off by industrial development. These became expressed as conflicts among property owners, driving municipal leaders to experiment at the boundaries of nuisance law and adjust to judicial review. I characterize the reoccurring property politics that regulate this household-market boundary as a form of “predistributive conflict” over the underling market rules shaping economic insecurity and privilege—in contrast to the more visible redistribution of market incomes.