Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Program Updates
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
The present study investigates how specialist organizations survive regulatory categorizations despite typically lacking the resources to adhere, relative to generalist firms. We blend ecological and institutional literatures to demonstrate that organizational identities create malleability in the resource space between specialist and generalist organizations to offer the latter more resources needed to survive instances such as the introduction of a regulation. To explore this process, we assessed how vape shop owners and employees used their organizational identities to frame responses to the FDA’s proposed regulatory categorization of e-cigarettes to garner public support. We collected 64 news articles and 865 corresponding comments from May 4th – May 11th, 2016 to capture discussions occurring before and after the FDA announced its plan to re-categorize e-cigarettes as tobacco products on May 5th. We used news articles to assess vape shop owners and employees’ responses. We added additional insights to these responses, by integrating news article comments to understand the perspective of their constituents (e.g., consumers). Thematic analysis revealed that vape shop owners and employees worked to garner public support by using the attributes associated with their identities to frame responses in a manner that bolstered authenticity. First, they categorized e-cigarettes as passion products that they were committed to introducing people to as the product helped them quit traditional cigarettes. Second, they categorized e-cigarettes as customizable products which meant they helped people explore their vaping preferences. Third, they voiced concerns regarding the true intentions behind the FDA’s regulation, which was a sentiment reinforced by their constituents.