Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Program Updates
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
In cultures where male power is hegemonic, mobilizing a masculine identity and avoiding the feminine can become problematic for environmental sustainability. I draw on critical gender theory and masculinities studies to reinterpret key scholarship on gender and environment and I combine this analysis with insights from the limited literature on masculinities and environment. Recent research suggests that anti-environmental attitudes and behavior as well as indifference or skepticism about environmental science and risk can be explained in part as performances enacted to signal a masculine identity to access material and social rewards in androcentric societies where eco-friendly attitudes and behaviors are considered unmanly. In addition to these direct anti-environmental performances, research suggests that enacting core masculine-coded performances not directly related to the environment – privileging the rational, technical and competitive, and avoiding feminine-coded emotion and cooperation – can also obstruct environmental protection. In market-centric political hierarchies, distancing from the feminine can result in environmental policies that exclude environmental justice arguments and favor economic growth and risky technologies like climate geoengineering over effective multi-lateral cooperation and greenhouse gas emissions regulation. This article suggests that environmental degradation ultimately belongs in the same category of masculine dominance acts as sexual violence and homophobia.