Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Program Updates
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
In recent decades, comparative research on postwar capitalism after its “Golden Age” has been dominated by a variety of institutionalist approaches. Underlying these accounts is an assumption that the trajectory of different “national regimes” is determined primarily by the structure of existing institutional arrangements. Wolfgang Streeck’s post-2008 writings represent a challenge to this literature. In what follows I trace the evolution of Streeck’s thinking on stability and change in postwar capitalism, and explore his influence on both “historical-institutionalist” literature and the employer-centered accounts associated with the “Varieties of Capitalism” school. It was Streeck’s increasing pessimism about the prospects for “containing” business, I show, that underpinned his growing divergence from institutionalist scholarship. At the same time, Streeck’s valuable contributions on the growing disjuncture between capitalism and democracy are undermined by a number of ambiguities.” These can be corrected by adding a more developed theoretical understanding of how “disorganization” can exacerbate structural inequalities in class power even if it is not engendered by particular class interests.