Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Program Updates
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
Critical food studies scholars have raised a number of concerns about the alternative food movement’s inability to fully address inequalities in the food system. Urban agriculture for example, has been critiqued for attracting elite and middle-class white participants while alienating others. Connected to this critique, there is debate about the relationship between urban agriculture and gentrification. Despite a number of studies contributing to this debate, few scholars have addressed whether the relationship between urban agriculture and gentrification might vary due to the many types of projects a broad definition of urban agriculture includes. Based on a review of studies of specific urban agriculture projects and ethnographic data on Franklinton Farms, an urban farm in Columbus, Ohio, I argue that organizational structure, leadership demographics, and goals need to be considered when assessing the benefits of urban agriculture and its relationship to neighborhood development and gentrification. In conclusion, I suggest avenues for further research on the relationship between urban agriculture and gentrification that considers varying types of urban agriculture projects when assessing the project’s impact.