Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Deadlines
Policies
Program Updates
Accessible Presentation
FAQs
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
This article examines the socio-historical origins of plea bargaining. Today plea bargaining operates in toxic combination with recent, mostly mandatory, sentencing practices to contribute to the rise of mass incarceration in a fundamental misreading of the common law. By probing competing accounts of the causes of plea bargaining, this work enables us to see how this controversial practice arose—something little understood until now. It lays the groundwork for a debate about how it might be sustained per Laffler and Missouri v Frye as a formal core of criminal process or adapted in light of the recent innovative Booker decision to allow a more significant role for the jury again.