Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Access for All
Exhibit Hall
Hotels
WiFi
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
Onsite Guide
In times of democratic and climatic breakdown, safeguarding funds from populist leaders can be crucial for policy survival. In this article, I reveal how processes of financialization can contribute to policy insulation. I show how lawyers and bureaucrats create financial intermediaries leveraging at least four socio-legal strategies that can potentially safeguard policy: (1) capitalization or who can finance an intermediary; (2) governance or what are the decision-making processes embedded in an intermediary; (3) procurement or which legal entity holds the funds; and (4) domestication or how is the intermediary connected to policy. To illustrate the utility of my framework, I adopt a two-step sequential mixed methods design using the case of climate finance in Brazil. First, I build a transnational climate finance dataset containing over 3600 grant-level payments to state and non-state actors in Brazil from 1990 to 2020. With network analysis, I trace the emergence of climate funds as financial intermediaries. In step two, with interview and archival data, I show how and why lawyers, bureaucrats, and donors designed financial intermediaries with specific capitalization, governance, procurement, and domestication strategies to safeguard climate policy. I conclude by discussing the effects of said strategies and calling attention towards how these strategies can safeguard policies in times of democratic backsliding.