Trust in Science: The Discourse of Public Trust and Scientists’ Morals

• In Event: 50462 - Section on Science, Knowledge, and Technology Roundtables
  In Refereed Roundtable (60 minute): Table 12: Trust and Uncertainty

Abstract

This paper explores the intersection of public trust rhetoric and the moralization of scientific conduct among scientists. It argues that while data illustrates rather stable and high levels of public trust in science in Western countries, especially in comparison to other social institutions, the pervasive discourse around a "crisis of trust," introduced at least two decades ago, functions as a device that activates moral norms among scientists. Drawing on theories from cultural sociology and the sociology of morality, the paper argues that cultural narratives, such as the public trust discourse, amplify moral judgments within the scientific community. This mechanism operates irrespective of the actual levels of public trust, revealing how moral norms are activated in response to perceived external scrutiny. Through an analysis of editorial letters in Science, the study demonstrates how trust-related language among scientists develops, forms specific narratives, and correlates with heightened moral discourse, particularly around publishing and gatekeeping in science, research ethics, political influence, and societal values. Then, through experiment, the study explores the activation of moral reasoning as a response to the rhetoric of public mistrust. The study seeks to shed light on the interplay between discourses around public trust, scientific practices, and morality. Ultimately, this research contributes to a deeper understanding of how rhetoric can shape the moral landscape of scientific practice, fostering a morally conscious scientific community. 

Author

• Elizaveta Sheremet, Columbia University