Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Access for All
Exhibit Hall
Hotels
WiFi
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
Onsite Guide
Research on parent-teacher contact often takes it as either social/cultural capital or parental involvement shaping student academic performance but neglects the agency of students and the equalizing effects of schools. To address these limitations, I propose a novel, two-dimensional framework, which contains an objective dimension – students’ existing academic performance – and a subjective dimension – students’ sense of belonging to school.
The analysis of two waves of data from the China Education Panel Survey (CEPS), based on school fixed-effects models, supports this framework. First, parent-teacher contact is irrespective of students’ past academic achievement, which refutes the reactive involvement hypothesis and supports the proactive involvement hypothesis. Second, in general, parent-teacher contact has a positive relationship with students’ subsequent educational achievement. Third, however, this positive general relationship has certain heterogeneities. It is statistically significant only among low-achieving students and students with a high sense of belonging to school, supporting the “gain” hypothesis, but not significant among high-achieving students and students with a low sense of belonging to school, supporting the “vain” hypothesis.
This framework provides theory-informed and practically applicable guidelines to better understand the educational implications of parent-teacher contact.