Naturalizing animals: Cultural Inception of Invasive Species

• In Event: 40863 - Animals Across Sociological Inquiry

Abstract

The spread of species alternately termed non-native, alien, invasive, or introduced has emerged as a critical issue in the context of the climate crisis and globalization. This concern extends beyond conservation biology to agriculture, economics, and public health. Despite the urgency, debates over species management practices and definitions remain fraught. A persistent dichotomy—classifying species as either native or alien—dominates ecological and socio-cultural analyses. But while with plants one can identify mainly interest among scientists and environmental activists, with animals one can identify a wider range of reactions and emotions even among the general public

This paper, part of a broader project on cultural attitudes toward alien and invasive species in Israel, explores when is an 'invasive' animal perceived as part of the landscape and culture? Using ethnographic research of observations, interviews, and network analysis the paper focusing on the Indian Myna, Nutria, and Funambulus squirrel, I demonstrate the dynamics of invasive animal naturalization are deeply intertwined with emotions, cultural frameworks, and political struggles.

Drawing on sociological theories of nature, emotions, and human-animal relationships, this paper highlights the cultural and political dimensions of these divergences and defines three ideal types of naturalization: (1) full naturalization, (2) rejection and eradication, and (3) partial integration without full acceptance. These models reveal how scientific debates, cultural metaphors, and emotional reactions shape public and institutional attitudes toward invasive species.By analyzing these contested narratives, the paper sheds light on the broader implications for conservation policies and socio-political dynamics in Israel and in general, and about human-animal relationships in the present era

Author

• Liron Shani, Hebrew University