Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Access for All
Exhibit Hall
Hotels
WiFi
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
Onsite Guide
Widespread adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has prompted researchers to
re-evaluate human-machine interactions in creative labor. While the assumption in new media
literature is that GenAI will transform but not replace human creativity, this prediction overlooks
the historical precarity of creative work. We examine GenAI by contextualizing it as technology
that accelerates two longstanding capitalist trends. First, GenAI intensifies distantiation—the
process by which representational technologies introduce physical distance between creators,
artifacts, and audiences—further eroding what Benjamin refers to as "aura." Second, GenAI
automates remix practices by drawing from vast datasets of human creative outputs to generate
derivative content. Though GenAI is a new technology, the zeitgeist surrounding it obscures
these longstanding trends. We argue that GenAI represents capitalism's continuation of task
automation, hyper-accelerating both distantiation and remix while potentially intensifying the
precarity of creative labor as efficiency is prioritized over human creative work.