Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Access for All
Exhibit Hall
Hotels
WiFi
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
Onsite Guide
Over the last several years, anti-trans policies have been introduced more frequently in more and more states in the US, including bills that restrict bathroom use, education, and access to gender-affirming healthcare. Using the case of Florida, which has passed multiple very restrictive anti-trans bills, I seek to understand the rhetoric used by those who support and oppose these bills, and how this is tied to notions of trans life as unlivable and disposable. I analyze 50 legislative sessions about 29 bills submitted in Florida, finding that supporters of these bills offer a unified argument that relies on dehumanization of trans people and a denial of their agency to make informed choices. Meanwhile, opponents of these bills employ either a neoliberal rights-based framework where trans people are productive citizens, or a more radical trans-feminist framework that names the state as violent, and locates the goal of these bills as the eradication of trans people. Through this analysis, I aim to explain how trans disposability and eradication are justified by state actors and everyday people, and how and why opposition is often ineffective against this rhetoric.