Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Access for All
Exhibit Hall
Hotels
WiFi
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
Onsite Guide
Since 1965, the “Rossi scale” has been regularly used in the social sciences and sociology to gauge the extent to which individuals feel that women should have access to a legal abortion by assessing their agreement with abortion in a series of circumstances. In the contemporary era, however, the conversation has shifted from a discussion of abortion rights to a discussion of abortion access. Moreover, feminist theory has moved beyond the use of an underlying “choice” logic to assess individuals’ attitudes toward abortion. In this article, I interrogate the prevailing use of the Rossi scale for measurement of abortion attitudes by investigating its reliability, assessing its enduring hierarchical nature, and verifying its unidimensionality. Despite concerns with the continued face validity of the Rossi scale, findings show that the scale continues to be statistically adequate. I discuss my most pertinent findings in these regards and propose potential analytic alternatives for future scholarship surrounding reproductive justice, abortion, and attitudes toward legal abortion in particular.