Individual Submission Summary
Share...

Direct link:

The Limits of Indemnity: Compensating Loss after Climate Disaster

Mon, August 11, 10:00 to 11:30am, West Tower, Hyatt Regency Chicago, Floor: Ballroom Level/Gold, Regency D

Abstract

How do climate disasters change social understandings of fair compensation for loss? Bridging work in economic sociology, environmental sociology, and classical theory, this paper elucidates disaster-driven changes in the moral economy of compensation. I focus on the principle of indemnity—the cardinal doctrine underlying property insurance—which dictates that insurance companies should offer individualized compensation for the loss of a home. Using textual, interview, and ethnographic data, I examine how indemnity was historically defined as a moral order in property insurance, and how it becomes contested in the context of total destruction that follows recent Northern California wildfires. I show how an extant tool for compensating loss—the individualized household inventory—is contested by homeowners, whose uncompensable existential losses become imbricated with their compensable material losses. I argue that the total loss that accompanies climate disasters changes moral understandings of what a sufficient, appropriate process of compensation looks like, from an individualized to a standardized process. I discuss how this shift impacts disaster recovery in an era of accelerating climate change.

Author