Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Access for All
Exhibit Hall
Hotels
WiFi
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
Onsite Guide
Recent scholarship notes that employers of migrant domestic workers (MDWs) play a significant role in amplifying or mitigating the precarity which MDWs labor under. This paper applies a Gramscian lens (articulation) to exploring how Singaporean employers talk about their relationship with their MDWs. Through an analysis of original interview data with white-collar employers, I find that employers talk about the MDW ‘contract’ as (1) something that MDWs enter into with informed consent, and (2) something only MDWs can rightfully break. Simultaneously, (3) unilateral contract-breaking on the MDW’s part is treated as ‘dishonourable’ for the employer. Collectively, these meaningfully construct the ‘contract’ into a symbol of fairness. Since the ‘contract’ itself is a significant device in enabling MDW precarity in the first place, these findings have major implications for scholars and activists who hope to understand, and tackle, this system of inequality.