Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Access for All
Exhibit Hall
Hotels
WiFi
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
Onsite Guide
Physical attractiveness has been linked to better economic, dyadic, and health outcomes but is understudied. We focus here on the gendered implications of attractiveness for one component of social well-being, access to intimate partnership and sexuality, among older adults. And we examine the role of body size as measured and as rated by an observer in evaluations of attractiveness and the diverging consequences for women and men. We use data from Rounds 1 (2005/06) and 2 (2010/11) of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (N=2144) to explore the association of two measures of body size, weight relative to height (BMI), and interviewer assessments of body size, with sexual behavior that requires a partner and with sexual behavior that does not. We find that at larger body sizes as reflected in both BMI and rated body shape, women, but not men, face a lower probability of having a partner and engaging in partnered sex, and a lower frequency of vaginal intercourse and receiving sexual touch. These associations are mediated by physical functioning for BMI and by attractiveness as rated by the interviewer for rated body shape. We also find that women, but not men, are more likely to report finding sex not pleasurable at a higher BMI, which partly operates through the mechanism of functional limitations. We suggest that these findings reflect different attractiveness standards for men and women, which reduce women’s access to partners and partnered sex but not solitary sex, such as masturbation.