Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Access for All
Exhibit Hall
Hotels
WiFi
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
Onsite Guide
How does property redistribution shape migration? I examine this question using the case of agrarian reform in Mexico, through which groups of farmers were granted collective property rights to agricultural land. Combining data on Mexican agrarian reform with new data on Mexican emigration to the U.S. during the early twentieth century, I asses both the direct and indirect community-level effects of redistribution on emigration flows. Preliminary results show that counties that directly received land grants subsequently sent more emigrants to the U.S. compared to counties that did not receive land grants. Indirect exposure to property redistribution—that is, communities near other communities that received land grants—consistently lowered the magnitude of subsequent emigration. I also find evidence that agrarian reform altered the composition of emigration flows: those who arrived in the U.S. from communities that recently received land grants were older and more likely to be female, while those coming from communities that did not recently receive land grants were more likely to be fist-time migrants, more likely to be accompanies by others, and more likely to be intending a permanent stay in the United States.