Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Access for All
Exhibit Hall
Hotels
WiFi
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
Onsite Guide
This research examines the racialized logics that underpin the clinical policing of pregnant patients suspected of using drugs. Clinical policing is the use of criminal-legal rationales and interventions in medical settings and includes using criminal suspicion to profile patients, non-clinically indicated drug testing, and reporting patients to punitive state agencies. Drawing upon qualitative interviews with clinical and social service professionals, I show that racial logics are mobilized to rationalize the use and expansion of punitive approaches and systems in unexpected ways. First, the history of reform within the child welfare system along with changing racial configurations of the opioid crisis, reinforce the illusion that the child welfare system is a benevolent service provider. Second, racial equity discourse is leveraged to justify expanding clinical policing through arguments for universal drug testing of patients. Finally, racialized disadvantage and urban “disorder” are re-articulated as “structural inequality.” This form of structural inequality is problematized as too complex to address through medicine and therefore requires a “strong arm” approach. Taken together, these themes suggest that racial logics that are not overtly racist and may even appear to address racial inequity can be deployed to bar patients from medicalization and place them on a track of punitive surveillance, marking a clear case of stratified medicalization, where certain populations are deliberately excluded from beneficial medical resources while being subjected to heightened surveillance and punishment.