Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Access for All
Exhibit Hall
Hotels
WiFi
Search Tips
Annual Meeting App
Onsite Guide
As climate change accelerates, a critical political contest has emerged: not over whether technological intervention is necessary, but which technologies will be deployed, by whom, and to what ends. Climate models and state climate plans have shifted from a narrow focus on reducing carbon emissions by deploying renewable energy, broadly known as "cleantech," to a broader strategy including novel technologies for capturing and storing carbon emissions, which I term "carbontech." While many of these technologies are still in early stages of development, they are slated to play a central role in future climate scenarios: the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change projects a need for removing billions of tons of carbon from the atmosphere annually by 2045. Environmentalists and many climate scientists, meanwhile, have criticized carbontech as economically unrealistic, a distraction from emissions reductions, and an example of fossil fuel industry greenwashing. How, and to what extent, carbontech will shape the future of climate change is a live political struggle spanning multiple empirical domains. It is also a theoretically generative case for developing stronger accounts of techno-politics, or the mutual constitution of technological and political development. This paper theorizes the techno-politics of climate change through a Gramscian lens. While previous work has focused on the fossil fuel industry’s connection to carbontech, this study focuses on another pillar of support: the U.S. tech coalition. Drawing on longitudinal analysis of the VERGE conference, the preeminent "climate tech" industry gathering, I demonstrate how carbontech grew to become a focus of the coalition.