Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Access for All
Exhibit Hall
Hotels
WiFi
Search Tips
After four decades of market fundamentalism, the global resurgence of industrial policy has marked a significant shift in economic governance. In the United States, this process began under the Biden administration with the enactment of four landmark legislations – the American Rescue Plan, the CHIPS and Science Act, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, and the Inflation Reduction Act – which have put industrial policy squarely back at the center of national economic strategy. To what extent did this wave of activism mark a new departure? Skeptics have suggested that recent industrial policies, especially in the case of the US – often referred to as Bidenomics – did not signal a dramatic shift from previous regimes. One group of studies argues that Bidenomics marked a continuation of pro-business policies that merely “derisked” private investment, while a second camp contends that U.S. industrial policy never disappeared but persisted in “hidden” forms. In this paper, I propose an alternative perspective. I argue that Bidenomics announced a fundamental reconfiguration of the state’s relationship with private industry, setting the stage for the emergence of a twenty-first-century American developmental state. Three features distinguish contemporary industrial policy from earlier paradigms: (1) directionality, targeting strategic sectors such as green energy and semiconductor manufacturing as well as specific regions and communities; (2) conditionality, linking corporate support to social, environmental, and geopolitical goals enforced by the state’s capacity to discipline private actors; and (3) politicization, as these initiatives generate visible contestation at both domestic and international levels. Drawing on policy analysis, expert interviews, and media sources, I trace how this emerging industrial strategy is reshaping the architecture of state–market relations in the post-neoliberal era.