Search
Program Calendar
Browse By Day
Browse By Time
Browse By Person
Browse By Session Type
Personal Schedule
Sign In
Access for All
Exhibit Hall
Hotels
WiFi
Search Tips
Panethnic and ethnonational attachment are two identities that may happen simultaneously. Various ethnonational groups are nested within a panethnic label, and each ethnonational group has a complex history in terms of their experiences of discrimination, immigration, and generational status. I ask the following research question: How do discrimination, incorporation, and demographic characteristics affect panethnic versus ethnonational attachment. For this research project, I conduct a comparative, quantitative analysis of Latino/a and Asian American panethnicity through a U.S. context. I examine publicly available data from the 2016 Collaborative Multi-racial Post-election Survey (CMPS 2016). I predict that discrimination and generational status of Latino/as and Asian Americans have a significant effect on panethnic and ethnonational attachment. My empirical analyses may demonstrate multiple outcomes: (1) Respondents may experience similar effects from both their ethnonational and panethnic attachments. A positive panethnic attachment and a positive ethnonational attachment may lead to a federated panethnicity (i.e., a panethnic label that is strengthened and maintained by ethnonational attachment. (2) Respondents may experience a positive effect on panethnic attachment, and the strength of their ethnonational attachment varies (strong versus weak). This outcome may lead to a diminishing ethnonational identity. (3) Respondents may not experience an effect on panethnic attachment but an increase in ethnonational attachment (i.e., panethnicity is not considered an outcome). (4) A weak panethnic attachment and a weak ethnonational attachment may lead to a lack of consciousness in terms of identity formation.